Remarkable X-Ray Source Populations

Contact

Photo of Niel Brandt
Niel Brandt
Pennsylvania State University

Summary

Spectra of the optical counterparts of serendipitous x-ray sources identified by XMM-Newton and/or Chandra

Finding Targets

An object whose ANCILLARY_TARGET1 value includes one or more of the bitmasks in the following table was targeted for spectroscopy as part of this ancillary target program. See SDSS bitmasks to learn how to use these values to identify objects in this ancillary target program.

Program (bit name) Bit number Target Description Number of Fibers Number of Unique Primary Objects
XMMBRIGHT 11 XMM-Newton sources with bright 2-12 keV fluxes 688 621
XMMGRIZ 12 XMM-Newton sources with outlier SDSS colors 102 96
XMMHR 13 XMM-Newton sources with unusual 2XMMi hardness ratios in the HR2-HR3 plane 807 747
XMMRED 14 Optically red XMM-Newton sources 565 521
CXOBRIGHT 58 Chandra sources with bright 2-8 keV fluxes 198 188
CXOGRIZ 59 Chandra sources with outlier SDSS colors 32 28
CXORED 60 Optically red Chandra sources 372 348

Description

This program targets remarkable serendipitous X-ray sources from the Second XMM-Newton Serendipitous Source Catalog (2XMMi; Watson et al. 2009) and the Chandra Source Catalog (CSC; Evans et al. 2010) that do not already have available identification spectra. Source types of primary interest include AGN (often obscured), X-ray binaries, magnetic cataclysmic variables, and strongly flaring stars.

Target Selection

XMM-Newton (bit 11-14)

XMM-Newton sources were required to lie within 14′ of the pointing center of an XMM-Newton observation, to have a 2XMMi detection likelihood greater than 12 as defined in Watson et al. (2009), to have a statistically significant match to an SDSS photometric counterpart, and not to have any 2XMMi problem flags set. Similarly, Chandra sources were required to have an SDSS counterpart and not to have any indication of Chandra source confusion. Furthermore, all XMM-Newton and Chandra sources having Galactic latitudes of |b| < 20 degrees were removed to emphasize extragalactic sources.

The four XMM-Newton source types for this program were all selected using SDSS model magnitudes, and are determined as follows (all optical fluxes are defined as fν Δν, where Δν is the width of the bandpass):

XMMHR

  • XMM-Newton sources were selected that have unusual 2XMMi hardness ratios in the HR2-HR3 plane.
  • i < 20.5 (to ensure reasonable BOSS spectral quality)
  • 2-12 keV X-ray to i-band flux ratios greater than 0.03 (to minimize stellar contamination)

XMMBRIGHT

  • XMM-Newton sources were selected that have bright 2-12 keV fluxes (brighter than 5 x 10-14 erg cm-2 s-1)
  • i < 20.0

XMMRED

  • Optically red XMM-Newton sources were selected that have SDSS colors of g – i > 1.0
  • i < 19.3
  • 2-12 keV X-ray to i-band flux ratios greater than 0.03.

XMMGRIZ

  • XMM-Newton sources were selected that have “outlier” SDSS colors: SDSS point-source counterparts that have g – r > 1.2 or r – i > 1.0 or i – z > 1.4.
  • i < 18-21.3
  • 0.5-2 keV X-ray to i-band flux ratios greater than 0.1.

There is some overlap among these XMM-Newton source-selection approaches (e.g., a bright XMM-Newton source might also have optically red colors). Therefore, at each selection step, we removed sources already selected in previous XMM-Newton selection steps (following the ordering above).

Chandra (bit 58-60)

As with the XMM-Newton sources, Chandra source types were all selected using SDSS model magnitudes, and are determined as follows.

CXOBRIGHT

  • Chandra sources were selected that have bright 2-8 keV fluxes (brighter than 5 x 10-14 erg cm-2 s-1)
  • i < 20.0

CXORED

  • Optically red Chandra sources were selected that have SDSS colors of (g-i) > 1.0
  • i < 19.3
  • 2-8 keV X-ray to i-band flux ratios greater than 0.03.

CXOGRIZ

  • Chandra sources were selected that have “outlier” SDSS colors: SDSS point-source counterparts that have g – r > 1.2 or r – i > 1.0 or i – z > 1.4.
  • i < 18-21.3
  • 0.5-2 keV X-ray to i-band flux ratios greater than 0

Again, there is some overlap among these Chandra source-selection approaches, and again at each step we removed sources already selected in previous Chandra selection steps (following the ordering above). We furthermore removed selected Chandra sources that were also selected as XMM-Newton sources.

REFERENCES

Evans, I. N., et al., 2010, ApJS, 189, 37 doi:10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/37

Watson, M. G., et al., 2009, A&A, 493, 339 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810534